<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Browne Eye Cycling Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilbrowne.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilbrowne.com</link>
	<description>Stories and news from Neil&#039;s sometimes twisted view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Head Badges and Soul by Erik</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2011/12/head-badges-and-soul/#comment-9203</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5060#comment-9203</guid>
		<description>I still ride my Paramount, but with modern pieces.   Sometimes the Big Gulps were replaced by beers and 16 inch bike pursuit races around the shop.  I hope the other Joe don&#039;t read this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still ride my Paramount, but with modern pieces.   Sometimes the Big Gulps were replaced by beers and 16 inch bike pursuit races around the shop.  I hope the other Joe don&#8217;t read this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Scott Joy</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9202</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9202</guid>
		<description>Neil, there is no &quot;for profit arm&quot; of the Lance Armstrong Foundation. The foundation licenses its LIVESTRONG brand to partners, including Demand Media for the LIVESTRONG.com health and fitness website, as well as Nike, Trek, RadioShack, Oakley, and others. Those partnerships generate millions of dollars to help people affected by cancer.

From its early days, the foundation has been about survivorship, about living with and beyond cancer. That&#039;s an important mission.

Of course some money is spent on marketing, a necessary expense to make sure people know about the foundation&#039;s programs, services, and events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, there is no &#8220;for profit arm&#8221; of the Lance Armstrong Foundation. The foundation licenses its LIVESTRONG brand to partners, including Demand Media for the LIVESTRONG.com health and fitness website, as well as Nike, Trek, RadioShack, Oakley, and others. Those partnerships generate millions of dollars to help people affected by cancer.</p>
<p>From its early days, the foundation has been about survivorship, about living with and beyond cancer. That&#8217;s an important mission.</p>
<p>Of course some money is spent on marketing, a necessary expense to make sure people know about the foundation&#8217;s programs, services, and events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by wes senechal (@wessenechal)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9201</link>
		<dc:creator>wes senechal (@wessenechal)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9201</guid>
		<description>RT @neilroad: Thanks to everyone reading my post &quot;The Lance Armstrong decision - a done deal or more to come?&quot; http://t.co/yIJFGCAa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @neilroad: Thanks to everyone reading my post &#8220;The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come?&#8221; <a href="http://t.co/yIJFGCAa" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/yIJFGCAa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Evolution Nutrition (@nutritiontweets)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Nutrition (@nutritiontweets)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9200</guid>
		<description>@Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? http://t.co/SkQ8bJGE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? <a href="http://t.co/SkQ8bJGE" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/SkQ8bJGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Phoenix (@brightonphoenix)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9199</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix (@brightonphoenix)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9199</guid>
		<description>The Lance Armstrong decision - a done deal or more to come? : http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? : <a href="http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Phoenix (@brightonphoenix)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9198</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix (@brightonphoenix)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9198</guid>
		<description>The Lance Armstrong decision - a done deal or more to come? : http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? : <a href="http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/HhzMv9Wf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by BewdleySportsMassage (@Funkiinell)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9197</link>
		<dc:creator>BewdleySportsMassage (@Funkiinell)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9197</guid>
		<description>RT @Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? http://t.co/BxHbPmTC” a good, insightful piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? <a href="http://t.co/BxHbPmTC”" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/BxHbPmTC”</a> a good, insightful piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by romath</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator>romath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9196</guid>
		<description>I assume Armstrong took drugs not so much because many of his teammates say so but because it was a condition of employment (competition).  However, I oppose this using of grand juries, Congress and, in the Armstrong case, racqueteering investigations to entrap elite athletes for behavior that is not even illegal. The other thing to note is that almost all the initial and successful prosecutions so far have been of black athletes.  Has a white gone down yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Armstrong took drugs not so much because many of his teammates say so but because it was a condition of employment (competition).  However, I oppose this using of grand juries, Congress and, in the Armstrong case, racqueteering investigations to entrap elite athletes for behavior that is not even illegal. The other thing to note is that almost all the initial and successful prosecutions so far have been of black athletes.  Has a white gone down yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Isleworth &#38; Syon Sch (@IsleworthPE)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9195</link>
		<dc:creator>Isleworth &#38; Syon Sch (@IsleworthPE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9195</guid>
		<description>RT @Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? http://t.co/BxHbPmTC” a good, insightful piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @Scienceofsport: “@neilroad: Is the Lance Armstrong decision a done deal or is there more to come? <a href="http://t.co/BxHbPmTC”" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/BxHbPmTC”</a> a good, insightful piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lance Armstrong decision &#8211; a done deal or more to come? by Harvey Shapiro (@HarveyShapiro)</title>
		<link>http://neilbrowne.com/2012/02/the-lance-armstrong-decision-a-done-deal-or-more-to-come/#comment-9194</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Shapiro (@HarveyShapiro)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilbrowne.com/?p=5188#comment-9194</guid>
		<description>#LanceArmstrong? Think #WallStreet and #high-pricedlawyers. Got the same result there. Outgunned or truth prevails?

http://t.co/3mcTV1sj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#LanceArmstrong? Think #WallStreet and #high-pricedlawyers. Got the same result there. Outgunned or truth prevails?</p>
<p><a href="http://t.co/3mcTV1sj" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/3mcTV1sj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

